Contracts

Background When a defect or water intrusion is alleged, owners and consultants often demand testing, core cuts, probes, tear-offs, or other destructive investigation before anyone knows whether the contractor’s work

Background Daily reports often become critical evidence when a project dispute arises. They may document manpower, work performed, delays, and directives from the owner or design professional. However, daily reports

Context: Manufacturer instructions are often overlooked in construction contracts, but they are critical. Many disputes arise when an owner, design professional, consultant, or upstream contractor directs installation in a way

Context: Construction projects move quickly. Payment disputes, order disputes, and scope issues often need a prompt interim decision before they damage the project schedule or increase claim costs. That is

Context: Construction contractors are often asked to install materials or systems that they did not select, design, manufacture, or test for compatibility with existing conditions. This is especially common on

Context: Water intrusion during construction is one of the most common and expensive sources of dispute in roofing, envelope, and renovation work, particularly when the contractor must open an existing